Monday, May 30, 2011

Comments!

Vianca:
http://veesmedia.blogspot.com/2010/12/criticial-view-of-music-videos.html

Kristina:
http://kristinuh.blogspot.com/2010/12/look-at-music-videos.html

Yunn:
http://yummylambs.blogspot.com/2011/01/graffiti.html

Olivier:
http://olivierseeyou.blogspot.com/2011/02/blog-3-mashups-and-copyright-laws.html

James:
http://comethroughmyplaza.blogspot.com/2011/02/hidden-humanity-behind-call-of-duty.html

Abigail:
http://funbloggintimezwithabi.blogspot.com/2011/05/blog-entry-2-critical-view-of-music.html



Sunday, May 22, 2011

BP Logo Parody

1. Balance, the formal balance of the logo and its simplicity is one of the reasons why I chose this logo parody. While I was looking through the other logo's, I found them quite cluttered and all over the place. The downward direction of the oil is also quite interesting because it forms an oil drop further showing the message of the new logo. Also, the logo shows harmony because the BP sunflower is not overpowering its oil filled counterpart. They are both equally shown.

2. The symbols used in the new logo are the BP sunflower and the oil. The use of the original BP logo, is part of the contest but it is interesting because it uses this logo as a symbol of the sun using the oil as the ocean. We've seen the picture many times, with the sun rising over the ocean. In fact if you google sunrise or sunset you see images just like the logo above. It was smart to use a familiar image to emphasize his logo. The BP sunflower setting into the ocean, which so happens to be oil. This is clever because the disaster that made everyone resent BP was partly because of the environmental damage it caused to oceans and its wildlife. The oil symbolizes the oceans that are now filled with oil. And the BP sunflower represents BP and setting into the oceans that it caused to be filled with oil. Damaging our environment and the species inhabiting it.

3. As I stated before, what this parody is saying about BP is that now that they created this mess, they must lay in it. They are drowning or 'setting' into the mess they made. The sun goes down every day and depending on where you see it, it may look like it is going under into the ocean. Which is similar to what is happening with BP now. Their company is going under with the oil that was released into the ocean due to their carelessness. Even with their efforts to fix their mess, there is still damage that has been caused symbolized by the oil drop at the bottom of the logo. In conclusion I believe that this logo parody expressed what was happening to BP now, and the illustrators thoughts on this subject. The illustrator presented a simple and balanced logo and uses great symbols to express themselves. It was really well done.

Friday, May 20, 2011

Digital Actors



















1. The use of digital animation and human acting is not just one or the other; it is a mix of both. In order to create the characters in Avatar, actors and the digital augmentation were both needed. As James Cameron, the director of the film said “it is an actor-driven process". The digital animation just enhances the acting and lets acting reach the places it would never be able to reach before. The 10-feet blue monsters in Avatar would have never been so brilliantly pulled off or look as life-like without the help of both digital animation and human acting.

2. Yes, I believe that the actors who portray the animated characters should still be eligible to win acting awards because they are doing just that, acting. The digital animation that is added to the movie does not change the acting; it just enhances its appearance. If an actor plays their part badly, the digital augmentation cannot fix it, it will still be bad. The acting is a template for the digital animator. British stage actor Andy Serkis states "There's a purity to it. You can't rely on anything else but your own skill as an actor".

3. I think human actors will not be obsolete, because film is a work of art. People will never tire of using people in their films. Film making is not only for those big corporations who do it for money, but also for those who want to express themselves through video and film. Although i feel that the amount of movies in the future containing human actors might lessen. There is also the essence that humans bring to films that can't be duplicated by technology, the emotion of the actor. Humans may be harder to work with and need more to satisfy and get a better take, but technology can't replace everything. Film is more than just money and convenience and for that reason; i think that human actors will never become obsolete.

Thursday, April 21, 2011

From Spray Can To Light: Grafitti Revisted






Light Graffiti: Out of all the light graffiti I have seen thus far, this is probably my favourite one. This picture uses light to show you sounds. You can't see sounds except for the rare disease that allows you to do so, but in any case it's still pretty cool. I think that the person who made this used the right tools using light to portray sound because it gives the 3D effect and suits how I picture sound. This picture uses the light lines to create texture, you are able to see the fine and smooth texture light has and I presume music has as well but because the lines are not straight and go up and down you can imagine the tempo or beat of the song and that it is moving. I think light graffiti shows more than just simple light art, the concept is great and has become one of my favourite light graffiti art.

Street Graffiti: This was the one picture that stood out the most for me. It has a 3D appeal even though, it was just painted on a basement parking lot wall. The colours the artist used flow really well, and its not too straining. There is a lot going on in the picture but enough that it doesn't look too scattered or too all over the place as some graffiti might look like. A lot of it is left up to interpretation but you still sense that there is a meaning to it, not just some random lines. It also has balance adding to the organized yet, still has the same style and effect of graffiti and overall this was a really good piece.

I think both styles of graffiti are similar in comparison to all the other art forms out there but they do have their differences. Light graffiti is great for creating unique art pieces without leaving anything behind. You can capture it and have it forever without using up any resources except for light. A lot can be done using light and paint and it is a great way to express and show who you are. Although it would not be street graffiti without the permanent essence of it. In conclusion I believe that these two art forms both have their similarities and differences but they both achieve the purpose of getting the artist's message out through art.

Thursday, March 3, 2011

The Grey Album - Mashups and Copyright Law


1. The Grey Album mashup is an abstract work of art. I think what DJ Danger Mouse is trying to communicate is how amazing both albums were even though the White Album was created many years ago and the Black Album not so long ago. And how together they created something equally amazing. This is not a comedic parody because he wasn't mocking or making fun of anything, in fact i think he was enhancing the songs and reinventing them making it an abstract work of media art.

2. Personally, I do not think it broke copyright laws because he used for creative expression, but then again I do not really know too much about copyright laws. The companies who actually do own the song may think otherwise. Whether or not it was for creative expression, he did go on the radar by having the album gain notoriety and popularity. The music label that owned the songs did not appreciate it even if he didn't mean to. He used their songs with their authorization and because it did become viral, that was all they needed to take legal action against him.

3. I can't make up my mind to whether or not mashups like this require copyright permission because although it was not DJ Danger Mouse's intent to break copyright law. He did it as an art form, a way to express himself. But also, he was using very well-known tracks that do not belong to him. I think that it would have been better if he did because he knew he wasn't going to be the only one listening to this mashup and that he was going to share it. I mean if someone took something you owned without asking and then made money off of it even though it belonged to you, wouldn't you feel like you were entitled to some of it especially because they used it without your authorization.